Modifier 22 – Noridian Administrative Services Processing Change

On January 31, 2012, Noridian Administrative Services (NAS) posted a Medicare Part B News update to Issue 274 dated November 16, 2011.    OF NOTE: NAS no longer requests additional documentation on procedure codes when billed with modifier 22.  Following the initial claim processing and payment, if a provider feels that additional payment is warranted, a Redetermination must be requested.  When submitting the Redetermination request, a separate concise statement explaining the necessity for additional reimbursement must be included.  This separate statement may be in the form of:

•The operative report;

•A separate letter; or

•The “Modifier 22 Explanation Form”

When Modifier 22 is appended to a surgical CPT code, it indicates to the payer that the work required to provide the service was substantially greater than typically required.  Modifier 22 can only be reported with surgical procedure codes that are specified as having a 0, 10 or 90 day global period.  Modifier 22 cannot be submitted with evaluation and management (E/M) procedures.

Documentation must support the substantial additional work and the reason

  • Increased intensity
  • Time (usual time vs. actual time)
  • Technical difficulty of procedure
  • Severity of patient’s condition
  • Physical and/or mental effort required
EXAMPLES:
 
  • Because patient was morbidly obese, cardiac  catheterization required additional 45 minutes beyond typical time required.
  • Patient had extensive and dense adhesions which had to be lysed, increasing the total time of the primary procedure by over an hour. 

Source: Internet Only Manual (IOM) Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Publication 100-04, Chapter 12, Section 40.2 “Unusual Circumstances”

Share
Posted in How-To, Medicare, News, Q & A, Q & A with RMC, RMC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

D-dimer Test Coding Q&A

Question:  “What is the best code for elevated D-dimer test?”

Answer:  Currently there is no official determination as to the best code for this test. 790.6, other abnormal blood chemistry, relates to chemicals/elements in the blood such as cobalt, copper, iron or lead and does not apply. Some coders like 790.92, abnormal coagulation profile. However, the D-dimer test looks for the breakdown of clots, rather than coagulation. Therefore, 790.99, other nonspecific findings on examination of blood, is recommended. The D-dimer test measures the levels of dextro dimer fragments in the blood. This can alert the physician to the presence of venous thromboembolisms. Venous thromboembolisms include both deep venous thromboses and also pulmonary embolisms.

Jane Barta, RHIA, RMC Coding Consultant

Do you have coding questions you would like answered?  Leave us a comment here.

Share
Posted in How-To, Q & A, Q & A with RMC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coding Question: Modifier 25

Q.1.  I have a question regarding chemo administration and an E&M on the same day.  Due to our remote area, many patients see the physician for their cancer follow up visits on the same day they may be getting chemotherapy.  These visits are distinct E&M visits from the chemo admininstration.  My question is that normally I would append the E&M visit with a  modifier ‘25’,  but the chemo administration is submitted on a UB-04 and then the E&M visit is submitted on a CMS-1500.   Since they are on two different claim forms, would I still need to append the E&M code with a modifier?

A.1.  In this scenario, the chemo administration is being billed by the facility, so it is submitted on the UB-04.  The physician’s portion (the clinic visit) is billed on the CMS-1500 (as long as there is sufficient documentation to support a separate visit).  There is no modifier needed. 

However, if the facility bills an E&M clinic visit plus chemo administration AND there is documentation to support a separate E&M service, modifier 25 would be appropriately appended on the facility E&M visit.

Share
Posted in How-To, Medicare, Q & A, Q & A with RMC, RMC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Now Hiring: Experienced Pro Fee Auditor/Coder – Remote

RMC is an Oregon-based coding review and coding support services company, founded to assist healthcare facilities in obtaining correct reimbursement and minimizing lost revenue through complete and accurate coding, documentation improvement, and education.   RMC has been providing comprehensive onsite and remote coding and auditing services to our hospital clients since 1994, and to our physician practice clients since 2002.

RMC is currently recruiting for an experienced professional fee coding compliance auditor who has a strong background in coding, billing and reimbursement guidelines. The position is responsible for analyzing health medical records to determine the accuracy of coding, billing and supporting clinical documentation. 

This position is REMOTE, Full-time, for a two month project with opportunity for future employment with RMC.  Independent contractor status only.

Responsibilities:

Under general supervision of the Director of Physician Coding & Compliance

  • Audit physician E/M, diagnosis and procedure coding/billing.
  • Conduct documentation compliance reviews and audit report writing.
  • Identify and communicate trends in coding compliance.
  • Work with physicians and other staff to provide education and training pursuant to audit results.
  • Perform backlog coding of professional services.

 Our ideal candidate will have:

  • Minimum 5 years experience as an E/M coder required, prior auditing experience desirable in either a provider or payer environment.
  • RHIT, CCS-P, or CPC credential required.
  • Expert ICD-9, CPT, HCPCS coding knowledge required.
  • Perform all coding and review services in accordance with official coding guidelines set forth by AHIMA, AHA’s Coding Clinic, AMA’s CPT Assistant, CMS regulations, and other applicable federal and/or state guidelines, and client-specific policies.
  • Working knowledge of applicable coding rules and regulatory requirements (e.g. NCDs, LCDs).
  • Ability to work independently.
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Word & Excel.

Please Contact:           Brianne: 800-538-5007 or  Brianne@rmcinc.org

 

Share
Posted in Employment Opportunities | Leave a comment

Documentation Question: Use of Scribes

 

Q.1.  Will you please describe medical record documentation rules regarding use of a scribe?  Apparently this is something that some of our providers are doing.
 
A.1.  Use of a scribe is something we’re seeing more and more, especially in light of EHR implementation and providers who may have limited keyboarding skills.   Scribes assist physicians on a real-time basis with documenting the patient encounter.  Scribing is usually performed by ancillary staff, non-clinical personnel, or even medical students.  Scribes must write down word-for-word only what the provider tells them to write (e.g. “Lungs are clear, no rales, wheezes, or rhonchi”) as stated aloud by the provider as the patient is examined. 
 
Scribing follows a different set of documentation rules.  Per CMS, if the encounter note has been created by a scribe the scribe should sign the documentation and indicate that s/he was scribing for the provider.  The provider then should affirm that the scribed note accurately describes the work s/he performed and co-sign the note.  For example, if a nurse or mid-level provider (PA, NP) acts as a scribe for the physician, the individual writing the note should document:  “Written by xxx, (title),  acting as scribe for Dr. XXX”   Then, Dr. XXX should include a statement that s/he reviewed the documentation for accuracy (add to it if additional information is necessary) and co-sign the note.  Scribed documentation is not the documentation of an independent observer using his/her own knowledge or skills to interpret what was done and why.  This is why the scribe should sign the note first, to indicate the role that was taken to document in the medical record, and the provider then attest to the accuracy of the note and sign off on what the scribe has documented.
 
Share
Posted in How-To, Medicare, Q & A, Q & A with RMC, RMC | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

RMC’s 2012 Audio Conference Schedule

We are excited to announce our new Audio Conference line-up!

FREE for all current RMC clients.
Non-clients: $10/person or $25/facility.

All conferences are approximately one hour in length. 

All sessions are pre-recorded, and will be available for listening from 9am-5pm PST on posted date.
All sessions available on CD for $50.00
AHIMA and AAPC approved.

REGISTER

January 19th
“ICD-10: Intro”
Laura Legg RHIT, CCS and AHIMA approved ICD-10 trainer


February 16th
“2012 OIG Workplan and OPPS Highlights”
Sarah Goodman


March 15th
“Newborn Conditions”
Stacy Hardin, CCS


April 19th
“ICD-10: Part 2″
Laura Legg RHIT, CCS and AHIMA approved ICD-10 trainer


May 17th
“Podiatry”
Jane Barta RHIA


June 21st
“Physician topic TBA”
Connie Eckenrodt RHIT, CHC, CHCA

Share
Posted in Audio Conferences | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Coding Question: Urgent Care

Our hospital has an off-campus urgent care center.  When patients come in for suture repair, may we bill both an E&M visit and a suture repair code if sutures are placed?

The answer is two-fold to this question.  First, (and most important!) the documentation must support both the E&M visit and the sutures.  Second, the urgent care should be owned by the hospital and billed under the hospital’s provider number as an outpatient department of the facility.

If this applies to your Urgent Care, then EMTALA regulations apply to the Urgent Care.  EMTALA means Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.  This was enacted in 1986 as part of the COBRA legislation.  It was put in place to protect indigent patients who go to an emergency facility from being transferred to another facility without an evaluation by a physician.  It actually applies to everyone, not just Medicare patients.

Because EDs and hospital-owned Urgent Cares are under EMTALA regulations requiring a physical evaluation on all patients presenting for care (before they can be transferred elsewhere), a separate E&M visit can be billed with a surgical procedure (as long as documentation supports both!). 

-Jane Barta, RHIA, RMC Coding Consultant

Do you have a coding questions?  Email brianne@rmcinc.org and we will post our answer on our blog.

Share
Posted in How-To, Q & A with RMC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Lumbar Facet Blockade Service Specific Review

Noridian Administrative Services (NAS) initiated a service specific review on November 1, 2011, for claims for Lumbar Facet Blockade and associated services.  NAS Medical Review is reviewing documentation submitted to support claims for CPT codes: 64493-64495 and 64622-64623 suspended during this review and will post findings on their website.

Effective January 1, 2012, CPT replaced procedure codes 64622-64623 with 64635-64636.  CPT codes 64622-62623 will continue to be reviewed for dates of service  prior to 1/1/12.

For more information, follow this link to the NAS website: https://www.noridianmedicare.com/p-medb/coverage/lumbar_facet_blockade/notification.html

Share
Posted in Medicare, News, RMC, RMC E-Alerts | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hiring: Professional Fee Auditor

RMC is an Oregon-based coding review and coding support services company, founded to assist healthcare facilities in obtaining correct reimbursement and minimizing lost revenue through complete and accurate coding, documentation improvement, and education.   RMC has been providing comprehensive onsite and remote coding and auditing services to our hospital clients since 1994, and to our physician practice clients since 2002.

RMC is currently recruiting for an experienced professional fee coding compliance auditor who has a strong background in coding, billing and reimbursement guidelines. The position is responsible for analyzing medical records to determine the accuracy of coding, billing and supporting clinical documentation. 

Candidate must be able to work ONSITE in Portland and Salem, Oregon clinics. 

RMC is willing to provide $5,000 signing bonus and an additional $1,000 towards relocation for a qualified candidate. 

Responsibilities:

Under general supervision of the Director of Physician Coding & Compliance

  • Audit physician E/M, diagnosis and procedure coding/billing.
  • Conduct documentation compliance reviews and audit report writing.
  • Identify and communicate trends in coding compliance.
  • Work with physicians and other staff to provide education and training pursuant to audit results.
  • Perform backlog coding of professional services.

 

Job Requirements

Our ideal candidate will have:

  • Minimum 5 years experience as an E/M coder required, prior auditing experience desirable in either a provider or payer environment.
  • RHIT, CCS-P, or CPC credential required.
  • Expert ICD-9, CPT, HCPCS coding knowledge required, mental/behavioral health experience highly preferred.
  • Perform all coding and review services in accordance with official coding guidelines set forth by AHIMA, AHA’s Coding Clinic, AMA’s CPT Assistant, CMS regulations, and other applicable federal and/or state guidelines, and client-specific policies.
  • Working knowledge of applicable coding rules and regulatory requirements (e.g. NCDs, LCDs).
  • Ability to work independently.
  • Proficiency in Microsoft Word & Excel. 

This is an ONSITE position in Portland and/or Salem, Oregon.  Full-time.  Employee or independent contractor status.

Hourly wage of $20-$25, dependent on experience.

RMC is willing to pay for relocation expenses for a suitable candidate. 

Please send resume and questions to Brianne Eckenrodt:  brianne@rmcinc.org  or fax: 503-658-7119

Share
Posted in Employment Opportunities, RMC | Leave a comment

Coding Question: OB Billing

Question:

I was reading your “As the Practice Codes” October 2011 issue about OB billing.  I have a mother that delivered on September 22, 2011.  My doctors in the clinic have performed the prenatal and delivery.  The patient had scheduled a PP follow up visit on 11-16-11 but no-showed the visit.  (I typically try to wait until the PP visit has been performed in our clinic to bill out).  Most likely if patient does eventually schedule her PP visit, it would probably be at our clinic but none has been rescheduled.  So I am trying to decide if I would bill the 59400 (total OB care) (even though no outpatient PP follow up care has been performed at this point) or would I bill out antepartum visits (59426) and delivery only (59409) plus E & M codes after delivery (like 99231, 99238).  Just not sure when the patient does not come back in for her PP follow up visit.  What would happen if we bill this out and then several months later comes in for PP follow up visit after we have billed?

Answer:

As you know, postpartum care includes both inpatient and outpatient services.  The relative value units for the global OB package include one routine office or outpatient postpartum visit, usually but not necessarily performed at 6 weeks postpartum.  Your physician can decide at what point the visit is no longer a routine postpartum visit and becomes a separate service.
 
Any postdelivery inpatient visits are included in the delivery service codes.
 
If your physician or group provided four or more antepartum care visits as well as performed the delivery, but did not provide the routine postpartum follow-up, it would be appropriate to bill the antepartum care only code (59425 or 59426) plus the delivery only code (59409, 59514, 59612, or 59620).  If your physician or group provided less than four antepartum visits, you would report the appropriate E/M service code for each of the antepartum visits, plus the delivery only code.
 
Your practice should consider developing a policy that addresses the reasonable timeframe for routine postpartum follow-up visits, especially with regard to patients who need to be rescheduled or miss their “6-week postpartum” follow-up. The American College of Obstetricians (ACOG) and the Gynecologists Committee on Coding and Nomenclature has stated that up to 12 weeks postpartum it is appropriate to include this visit in the global OB package.   
 

   

 

Share
Posted in How-To, Newsletters, Q & A, RMC | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment